
These papers are available.
Same day delivery! Only $12.95
/page + FREE Bibliography!!!
FREE Excerpts available on request! Select any paper below!
|
Papers On More Philosophers & Philosophies
Page 18 of 401
|
|
Nietzsche's 'The Antichrist'
[ send me this paper ]
A 25 page argumentative essay on the issues and Frederich Nietzsche's predictions surrounding pity, negation, nihilism, and science on the antichrist in society (all who are not Christian). The writer argues that some of Nietzsche's points were valid for the antichrist, particularly as they relate to pity, negation and near annihilation. And, while there is little evidence that the development of science suffered from Christianity in this century, as posited, many of the people who perform the acts of science are just as Nietzsche would predict—empty voids without intrinsic instincts or senses about their actions. The paper concludes that despite the book's emotional and circular format and sporadic truths, it has value for at least one group of readers—the one for which it was written, the Hyperboreans. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: Nietac.wps
Nietzsche's View of Philosophers
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page paper describing Nietzsche's philosophical view of the ancient philosophers such as Socrates and Plato. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: Nietview.wps
Absolutism vs. Relativism Analyzed
[ send me this paper ]
This 10 page research paper examines this historic philosophical argument through definition and example. Specifically discussed are the philosophical writings of the Greek Sophists, Niccolo Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, St. Thomas Aquinas, Michel de Montaigne, William James and Jean-Paul Sartre. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Filename: Absolut.wps
Locke & Machiavelli / Politics and the Interests of Man
[ send me this paper ]
Machiavelli and Locke both considered the nature of government and man's individual interests as they relate to governmental structures. Machievelli's idea of fortune and Locke's 'state of nature' concept both shaped the theorists arguments about the purpose of political life. It has been posited that for Machiavelli, politics is an unpredictable arena in which ambition, deception and violence render the idea of the common good meaningless, while Locke would argue that political or civil society exists only to preserve the rights of the individual. It can be argued that for both Machiavelli and Lock, political activity, then, becomes merely a means of satisfying selfish ends. This 8 page paper considers the nature of this argument, reflects upon the elements presented in Machiavelli's Prince and Locke's Social Contract, and evaluates their importance for understanding the underpinnings of government. No additional sources cited.
Filename: Lockmach.wps
Can't find what you're looking
for?
Order customized
assistance instead!


© 2008
The Paper Store Enterprises,
Inc. All graphics on this site were either created or licensed by
TPS, Inc. All reports delivered via AcademicIntegrity.Com remain the
intellectual property of the corporation and its contracted research
writers. No portion of our work may be reprinted or presented in a
student's own report without proper attribution to TPS as a source.
|
|